June 1, 2016 Industry Forum Blog Usually when I ask a company what their target is for their Health and Safety measure of choice, I am quoted a figure greater than zero. “So you are planning to have an accident? A death? Time lost at work? A pollution incident or perhaps just a few fires?” is my immediate question. This does normally make people pause and think! We can’t justify setting an acceptable level for harm to people, equipment or the environment – unless it’s zero. Put the boot on the other foot. Do you go to work in the morning and expect to come home with all your fingers and toes? Of course you do. So how do we achieve this? Over the last 4 decades I have been exposed to various H&S approaches. In the 80’s the emphasis was on completing the “Incident, Accident, Near Miss” form. It was viewed as an administrative evil and the usual action to prevent a repeat was “told the operator to take more care”. Then in the 90’s I was instructed that this just wasn’t enough. We needed to find more tangible ways to prevent the accident from reoccurring. I seem to remember sending a FLT driver who had hit a large pillar for an eye test and using of a lot of yellow paint to highlight obstacles! I can feel you squirming at my unenlightened and reactive approach to safety. In this millennium I think we have tried to be more proactive. The emphasis has switched to prevention rather than taking steps after the event to stop it happening again. Unfortunately we have then been exposed to, shall we say, some overzealous officials using the H&S name in vain. A quick Google will reveal many ridiculous examples of H&S “gone mad”. Everything from children having to wear goggles to play conkers to removing door mats as they are a trip hazard. Of course the problem created by the “Safety Elves” is that all the genuine advice and regulations are viewed with extreme speculation, or worse ignored. What’s even more insidious, if we wrap everybody and everything in cotton wool, how will the next generation learn to recognise potential hazards and estimate risks? The Health and Safety Executive responded by setting up a Mythbuster Helpline where you can challenge disproportionate or legally inaccurate decisions made in the name of H&S. At last we can have tea cakes served untoasted and understand the risks associated with doing tumble turns in the swimming pool. Have we a sensible option? My faith in a sensible approach to H&S was restored when I discovered Total Productive Maintenance (TPM), and in particular the Safety, Health and Environment (SHE) pillar. In brief it encompasses both a reactive and a proactive approach to achieve zero accidents (slips, trip falls etc.), zero overburden (physical and mental stress) and zero pollution. Over time the proactive approach becomes dominant and the culture shifts from a corrective control environment (think me in the 80’s) to one where the whole team acts together to achieve the goal of zero accidents. To do this the team members draw from a range of SHE strategies that address both behaviour and equipment generated accidents. This article lists some of the more common ones used by JIPM award winners. These companies have achieved many years of zero lost time and environmental accidents. So to answer the initial question is yes, you can achieve zero accidents. To find out how the SHE pillar can help you contact the IF team.
May 26, 2016 Industry Forum Blog Kanban is a Japanese word that translates as signboard or billboard. In a manufacturing setting we interpret it as “signal”. Taiichi Ohno is credited with developing the idea in Toyota, after observing how high street supermarkets worked. He noticed that a shopper only buys what they need, when they need it. In turn the supermarket only stocks what it can sell at any given time. The store maximises its sales for the area it has, and maximises profit by ensuring there is little waste like unsold and out of date goods. In a similar fashion, kanbans in our factories are used to align the supply of goods with downstream customer demand and eliminate waste. The kanban is a visual signal that gives permission, or instruction, for the receiver to do a specified action. Originally produced on cards, kanbans can also be small objects or even product bins. How can it help you? Kanbans are primarily used as part of a pull system. They: Prevent overproduction, one of the 7 Wastes. Without a kanban you can’t produce! Help keep the flow of product at a steady rate. This is very useful where a single resource, like a press, is used for multiple products, resulting in batching. Reduce the amount of inventory (another waste) needed to keep a system flowing. This reduction releases cash and helps us to complete the cash flow cycle more quickly. Control the amount and movement of inventory. How does it work? This is best explained using the diagram and starting at process G. G receives an order to produce in the form of a “withdrawal kanban”. This gives permission for a person to take a specified quantity of named parts out of the supermarket. The withdrawal triggers a “production kanban” that travels upstream to process F. It gives permission for F to make a specified quantity of the parts. These replace what was taken from the supermarket. Rules and conditions Kanbans have to have rules to work and these must be strictly followed. No items are made or transported without a kanban. Pull don’t push. The downstream process always starts the flow. Only make the number of items specified on the kanban. Do not pass on defective units. To set up a successful kanban system, you need a stable production process to start with. If you have high unplanned downtime, poor right first time or lengthy and unpredictable lead times you will end up planning in excessive inventory. If there are any flow issues with your kanban system, like you run out of parts, then treat it as an opportunity for improvement. Identify the root cause and countermeasure it. Electronic kanbans Electronic kanbans are used for real time signalling across the supply chain. Instead of the kanban cards being moved by people, the information in bar code form is scanned using a card reader. It is sent through an Electronic Data Interchange (EDI), or over the web, to the upstream supplier, who prints them out for use. Other uses for kanbans Kanbans are so useful at waste elimination that they are also used outside the world of automotive manufacturing. Have a look at the four case studies in Mattias Skarin’s book Real-World Kanban. In one, kanbans are used to pull software development through the design and development stages. For help in designing and deploying kanbans or pull systems, contact the team.
May 19, 2016 Industry Forum Blog Every aspect of our modern day supply chain is being optimised. Whether B2B or B2C an ever increasing array of products needs to be sourced, manufactured and delivered more efficiently. In our last blog we looked at the reasons why the way in which we select, order and receive our goods is undergoing a radical change. Here are 10 ways in which technology is being used to drive down costs and environmental impact, at the same time as meeting our tougher demands. Some of these changes may sound far-fetched, but they are all being used or trialled right now. Selecting and ordering 1. Most of us have probably already ordered direct via an app on smart phones and home computers. Yesterday I ordered a pair of curtains on line. They were delivered free in under 24 hours. I could not have picked them up from my nearest store any quicker, or cheaper! 2. Objects or goods can also directly order a service or spare parts, if they are part of the Internet of Things (IoT). My new British Gas boiler is supplied with Boiler IQ. It’s feasible that the first I know about a drop in performance is when the engineer phones me to arrange the repair. Manufacturing 3. Goods are starting to be manufactured in smart factories and cloud computing is enabling entire supply chains to work in sync, reducing inventory and waste in the information flows. The days of ERP systems scheduling weekly buckets (in a linear fashion), will be replaced by real time integrated systems that share demand, inventory and capacity information. 4. Predictive analytics (Big Data) is increasingly deployed to predict consumer’s requirements. The aim is to make exactly what is required, as close as possible to the time it is needed. Storage and picking 5. Intelligent storage and distribution space allocation software is being used to improve accuracy and control of inventory. 6. The use of indoor GPS systems is allowing FLT drivers to increase pallets stored or retrieved by 30% per hour. 7. Operators with wearable tech will be able to work more quickly than using hand held devices. 8. Collaborative robots with “vision” are being developed to work alongside human pickers in warehouses. Distribution 9. Smartphone apps and GPS, support real time integrated delivery tracking from despatch right through third party delivery companies and to the customer. I knew where my curtain delivery was at all times. 10. The growth in delivery options are, in my opinion, the most eye opening changes. We have: Uberized trucking. Mobile apps can help you find a faster, cheaper carrier. Equally they allow drivers to maximise payload, reduce fuel bills and ease congestion. Autonomous delivery vehicles, due in London at the end of 2016, and drones are already in use. Both need less infrastructure than traditional manned vehicles helping ease congestion. Lifestyle couriers, like the lady who dropped off my curtains. There are now tens of thousands of self-employed couriers in the UK alone, usually working hours to suit themselves for 3rd party carriers. Thousands of parcel shops and mini locker systems are also used by these carriers. They offer greater convenience and often cheaper services for many consumers wanting to return or receive goods. Many of these systems are simple to install and use. They are increasingly affordable, scalable and can be added to existing equipment and operations. This means your local craft brewer can access customers as readily as any large manufacturer. If you want assistance on remapping your business, bear these developments in mind or contact the team.
May 16, 2016 Industry Forum Blog If you are reading this blog then I can guarantee that your lifestyle has led to dramatic changes in our supply chain and logistics functions. I know this because you are clearly not an off-grid spoon whittler in the wilderness of Alaska. You are a consumer used to having goods and services delivered direct to your home, place of work or even your smart phone. The way in which we are selecting, ordering and receiving our goods and services is undergoing a radical change. In fact what was once considered the end point of the supply chain, the final delivery to the customer, is now no longer the end. Thanks to the Internet of Things we are now interacting with the supplier long after we have received and started using the item. And, if we return goods that are either not what we wanted, or for recycling, then we are engaging in what is now termed a reverse or circular supply chain. Our demands have changed Not only do we now demand fast delivery times, but we want items delivered to wherever we are, not just to an address. And while we might be prepared to pay for express delivery, we want free options as well. We want to choose our own set of features, not just accept an available product. This increases the complexity of the supply chains. Manufacturers are faced with more frequent change overs of equipment and potentially more stages and hand offs within the manufacturing process, as more departments become involved with making each item. We also expect to be able to change our mind and return unwanted items at no cost to ourselves. This trend is on the rise as we buy more and more items on line. Our supermarkets are also becoming more demanding of the manufacturers. I’ve noticed a new trend; where once we would have found separate boxes for each variety of a product, we now find the same size box with a mix of three. More choice in less space is good for retailers, where availability and maximising sales/m2 are key drivers. But again it adds a level of complexity to the supply chain. Added to this, our demands are made against a back drop of rising transportation costs and increasing pressure and legislation to reduce any negative impact on the environment. It is estimated that 50-70% of a company’s profits are eaten away by supply chain and logistics costs. The supply chain response Manufacturers, suppliers and logistics organisations are responding to these pressures and making changes to the way that goods are ordered, made, stored, despatched and transported. Every component of the supply chain is under the microscope and a combination of lean techniques and new technologies are changing the way our supply chains work. Here are a few examples: As well as eliminating waste using traditional lean techniques, the creation of value streams run by cross functional teams, works well to reduce complexity in the manufacturing part of the supply chain. Late customisation of items is another manufacturing response. Although this can work well, where flavourings or colour are added late in the process, it is not a viable option for all. The use of real time integrated systems (supported by Cloud computing), wearable technology, GPS and 3D printing is also being deployed to take waste and non-value adding elements out of storage and distribution operations. Next week we will take a closer look at some of the changes made possible by using new technology.
May 5, 2016 Industry Forum Blog 5S, 7 Waste, change overs, Changeover time, Nissan, set up time, SMED, Standardised Work “You should always be able to take out at least 50% of the set up time”, was the target set me by my master engineer from Nissan. In fact SMED equates to changeover in less than 10 minutes! Having already tried videoing changeovers and studying them with a team, this seemed like quite a tall order. However I was soon to discover there was far more to reducing the time than just looking for waste on a video. In the last blog we looked at the benefits gained by improving your set up times. In this blog we look at a structured technique and 5 tips that will enable you to halve the time your machine is stopped. These work whether it is an old press or the latest 3D printer. The four step technique Step 1: Capture the current situation. Use a video to capture the whole changeover. Break it down into work elements and record them on a Standardised Work Combination Table. Changeover time is defined as the amount of time taken to change a process over from the last part of a production run to the first good, repeatable part of the next production run. The phrase “first good repeatable part” is important. It’s not unusual to find processes where the first part may be correct but subsequent parts are not. Or extrusion processes where changes in material or colour take a while to be purged. Step 2: Separate internals from externals. Decide if each element is an internal or an external using these descriptions. Internal Element – any work element that cannot be carried out safely unless the machine is stopped, e.g. tool changes, material alignment External Element – any work element which can be carried out safely while the machine is running, e.g. preparation of tools, materials etc. Now re-organise the steps. Put all the external steps either before or after the machine is stopped. Look how the red stop time decreases. Step 3: Convert the internals to externals. This usually involves some physical change to the equipment allowing you to move yet more elements to externals. Step 4: Eliminate the waste. Use the 7 Waste technique and the tips below, to further reduce the length of the red bar. 5 Top Waste Elimination Tips 1. Reduce the need to measure and make adjustments. Aim to pick and place tooling into the exact location, first time. Use: Block gauges. 1 fixed datum point. Colour coded location lines, or match marking, for different tools. And configure and label setting gauges. 2. Simplify and standardise the tools used. By standardising the tooling dimensions, we could use tools that fit instantly instead of having to use adjustable tools. 3. Bolts should be treated as the enemy! Rigorously eliminate them. In this example we used 1 quick release catch instead of 2 screw fastenings. Make sure any remaining bolt heads are a uniform size. This reduces the time it takes you to search for and pick up different hand tools. If Allen keys are used, weld them into position. This saves you handling time. If bolts are the only option, ensure that the bolt length is reduced to the working minimum. 4. Avoid using cranes and hoists. They are slow. Use tables or scissor lifts set at the access point height. Prepare as an external. 5. Always keep a good 5S standard. External preparation, configured tooling and clean equipment all save time during the set up. Remember every second counts! If you would like more examples or any assistance on SMED please contact the team.
May 5, 2016 Industry Forum Blog, Resources SMED, which stands for Single Minute Exchange of Die, is also known by a number of other names, for example Set Up Reduction and Set Up Improvement. The term SMED was allegedly coined by Shigeo Shingo, after the Second World War, when the Japanese car manufacturers found themselves competing against the large car manufacturers of the United States. The Japanese had very little money and were working with old presses, discarded by the manufacturers in the States, who in contrast had enough money to buy new presses and dedicate them to separate components. For the Japanese to compete it was imperative that they size changed each press frequently and to be competitive this had to be done quickly. Shigeo Shingo, a guru in this field, was a keen golfer whose aim was a single figure handicap i.e. a number under 10. Single Minute Exchange of Die means any number less than 10 minutes. SMED has been further refined to OTED, One Touch Exchange of Die, and zero minute exchange of die, by those well down the road of applying the technique. The Set Up Improvement tool is traditionally used to reduce the amount of time that a machine is not running, while it is being changed over to run a different part. In non-manufacturing situations the tool can be used to reduce the amount of time that a process is not running when it is either being changed to run something else or while it is stopped, or interrupted for other essential or routine tasks.
April 29, 2016 Industry Forum Blog, Resources In these days where consumers demand an ever increasing variety of goods and services at the touch of a button, the flexibility of your process is key. Whether you’re running equipment invented in the first industrial revolution or the fourth, you will almost always benefit from reducing the amount of time it takes to change from making one product to another. This is what we do when we use the SMED (Single Minute Exchange of Die) tool, also known as Set Up Improvement and changeover reduction. The major use of Set Up Improvement Reducing the time it takes to do each set up gives you two options. You free up more time to produce parts. This is useful if you are running overtime to meet orders, but it can be counterproductive. If you don’t sell all those extra parts, you end up with excess finished goods. Overproduction and its resulting inventory are two of the 7 Wastes and have their own associated costs. Use the time to do more (now shorter) changeovers. This allows you to plan smaller production runs and so reduce batch sizes. It is this second option that has more scope for improving not only your competitiveness, but your cash flow as well. The 5 benefits of reducing batch sizes Reduce overproduction and thus the amount and cost of the inventory held in your plant and supply chain. This improves cash flow and reduces risk to your business. Planning smaller, but more frequent runs of a product results in a shorter lead time. This means you can respond much more quickly, and with less cost, to unexpected changes in customer demand. Running smaller and smaller batches allows you to internally level the demand on your process and so introduce pull and flow. This is one of the underpinning principles of a lean system. It makes current equipment more flexible, meaning you don’t have to purchase additional equipment to meet delivery and variety requirements. You will improve your Stock Turns and Floor Space Utilisation metrics, as less stock is held and the resulting space is used to generate value. Always remember to calculate how much you have saved and share this information across your business. Where and when can I use SMED? Although the technique was refined by Japanese auto manufacturers after World War II, it is still an incredibly powerful tool that will play a more and more important role in today’s consumer driven society. If your equipment (or process) is needed for more than one product, in one colourway, you will need to change it over. This applies whether it is a 60 year old press or the very latest 3D printer. I took the opportunity at a recent show to climb round the back of some 3D printers. It made me smile to see that there are as many opportunities to reduce changeover times on these as there are on our older manufacturing kit. In next week’s blog I will outline the best method I know to improve your set up time and also share some of my favourite tips. These can be applied to all sorts of equipment and also to non-manufacturing processes. So no matter what your business, read on to discover how you can make a host of low cost improvements.
April 21, 2016 Industry Forum Blog In the 90’s I worked in an amazing old 4 story mill where we made replica football kits. Half of the bottom floor was dedicated to incoming rolls of material and outgoing finished shirts and shorts. While some problems were instantly apparent, like transporting all the material to the top floor to be cut, others were less so. Our business was expanding and in 1 year alone we doubled the order book. I had to increase the workforce and invest in more equipment. The biggest increase in staff was for material handlers, we barely kept material flowing round the plant. We bought extra cages, opened up an old warehouse across the road and tried to breathe life into an old conveyor system. Then one day the cutters on the top floor ground to a halt. “What’s the problem?” I asked. The young material movers took me downstairs to the warehouse. Every shelf was full of rolls of material – so why nothing to cut? If you’re a long suffering football fan you’ll know there is a new kit available at least once every season. I found every shelf was full of obsolete stock. There was no room left to bring in any new material! The person ultimately in charge of the business was an accountant by trade. As inventory is traditionally reported as a current asset on the balance sheet, he couldn’t bear to write it off. Instead of getting rid, or moving it to a more remote location, we had to hire containers for the new rolls. Fortunately since then, I have learned that excess inventory is one of the 7 Wastes. Excess means anything more than is required to maintain the process flow. Now I’m in a better position to question an accountant’s logic. Have a look at the problems that are associated with excess inventory. Hidden costs Physical storage for any inventory not being worked on – off site warehousing, shelving. And in non-manufacturing businesses – computer memory storage, archives and in trays. Upkeep of storage space – rents, rates and power bills. Cash is tied up in inventory, it is something you have bought but have not yet sold. Too much inventory can result in cash flow problems. Transporting inventory to and from storage – people, equipment such as FLTs, conveyors and trolleys. Add on the running costs and maintenance of that equipment. Cost of stock taking – people and equipment. Potential damage during handling and transport. Not just to the product but to infrastructure and injuries to people. Cost of protecting the material during storage – special lighting, temperature control, coatings and preservatives. Insurance for items in storage. Costs associated with stock rotation – people and equipment. Other problems Money and storage tied up in slow moving and obsolete stock prevents purchase and incoming deliveries of material required now. This can result in late deliveries to the customer. Holding high levels of inventory masks other problems: Raw materials hide supplier delivery problems. WIP hides bottlenecks, unplanned downtime, idle time and excessive operator motion. Finished goods hides quality problems which can lie undiscovered until the customer finds them. High levels of finished goods are a risk. They can become obsolete due to cancelled orders or a specification change. Ask yourself “Do I incur any of these costs and problems?” and “What else could I do with the space, time and money tied up in excess inventory?”
April 13, 2016 Industry Forum Blog As we enter the Fourth Industrial Revolution the various asset management and Computerised Maintenance Management Systems (CMMS) offer bigger, better and more affordable solutions than ever before. Instead of using your own computer network you can buy into cloud based systems. In the world of interconnected devices every user can access the system using tablets or smart phones. Even the machines can connect direct to the hub, feeding information back for analysis and receiving instructions to optimise running conditions. Old equipment? No problem, there are plenty of low cost retro fit devices for monitoring key parameters. And of course all these systems are scalable, you can start small and add as you go along. But before you rush out to buy the latest sensing technology and cloud based multi-screen service there are some important things to do to ensure you get the best out of your investment. Decide on your maintenance strategy – how much are you willing to spend and for what expected benefit? What is the overall goal of your maintenance strategy? Are you planning to maintain the same level of effectiveness and reduce maintenance costs or, continue to spend the same on maintenance and increase effectiveness? Figures from Dupont’s 1991 benchmarking study showed that: Minimising maintenance costs while maintaining plant efficiency at the current level of 83.5%, would save them $1.2m per year. Maintaining the current level of maintenance spend and improving efficiency to 93.3% would increase profit by $9m per year. The choice here was described to me as a “no brainer!” Select the most important pieces of equipment With the lure of relatively cheap devices, say £100-£150 per sensor, it may be tempting to connect all your equipment. But is this the best use for your money? What value will you get? Will the mass of information cause you to spread your maintenance resources too thinly? Most of us do not have the luxury of unlimited maintenance crews. You can focus the allocation of spend and labour by identifying your most critical items of equipment. Simple tools like Value Stream Mapping and structured equipment ranking systems will help you do this. 3. Maintain that equipment well From a lean manufacturing viewpoint your assets generate value by being available to run when they are required, at the optimum speed and produce the right quality. This is opposed to the traditional view of creating maximum value by running the equipment at all times. Key to maintaining equipment availability is being proactive and looking after the equipment itself. Not just monitoring it and reacting to break downs. And a final thought. When selecting CMMS features, which is more important – equipment efficiency or maintenance efficiency? Concentrate on improving equipment efficiency before tackling maintenance efficiency. Having to repair items less frequently is better than being able to repair them quickly. Now you are in a position to invest in technology to further improve both equipment and maintenance efficiency. You know what budget you have and what you want to do with it in terms of plant efficiency. You can prioritise which equipment you want to spend it on. You have a solid starting base of well-maintained equipment. This prevents you wasting money on reactively monitoring equipment that is prone to failure. You can now pick the technological interfaces which will benefit your human resource the best – eliminating wasteful tasks and enhancing the team’s problem solving and diagnostic capabilities. Related article 10 top tips for choosing the right CMMS software for your planned maintenance needs. Read more here: http://bit.ly/1RVdABY
April 6, 2016 Industry Forum Blog, Resources Mistake Proofing is also known as Poka Yoke or Error Proofing. It used to be referred to as Baka Yoke, Japanese for fool proofing. This name has dropped out of favour as more is understood about the causes of defects. Rather than blaming a defect on an employee, we now look at it from the perspective that wherever people are involved, there is a risk of error. It is the errors that give rise to the defect. Shigeo Shingo developed this philosophy while he was working for the Toyota Motor Corporation in 1961. A Mistake Proofing device is any device or mechanism that either prevents an error from being made or detects when an error has been made. The key is that we are looking to prevent or detect the error that leads to the defect. The ultimate goal of Mistake Proofing is to eliminate the wastes associated with errors. To help explain the last two points let’s use an everyday occurrence, beautifully illustrated by a talented student who went on to use their skills in vehicle design. Consider the image at the start of this blog, the lorry stuck under the bridge. What are the wastes involved here? You may have come up with; operating time for the lorry and driver, the time lost by all the people stuck behind the incident, the damage to the lorry and the goods inside it, even damage to the bridge. Each of these has an associated cost. What was the error that the driver made, to end up with the defect of the lorry stuck under bridge? You could list many different causes of the error, but for this example we will choose process error – not following Standard Operations. The driver did not follow the height warning signs before the bridge. How could we prevent or detect this error from occurring? We could replace the low bridge with an alternative route, like this flyover bridge with no height limit. Expensive, but it prevents the error of not following the height warning. Or we could install a cheaper detection device in front of the bridge. The driver would hear and feel the clunk of the suspended pole. This alerts them to the fact they have made an error, before the defect occurs. Some waste would still occur. The driver has to stop and reverse and there may be some minor scrapes. However these are not as drastic as the quantity of waste in the initial scenario. The benefits of well-designed Mistake Proofing devices include; making the job simpler for the employee and improved Quality, Cost and Delivery performance, as defects and other wastes are eliminated. Improved safety is another benefit. Preventing or detecting errors before they result in an accident is not only beneficial in manufacturing operations but for any process that can be performed incorrectly. This includes processes the end user of the product may carry out or processes in a different field altogether, like medicine. Who wouldn’t want to prevent incidents like amputating the wrong limb or administering an incorrect dose of a drug? Over the years I have seen many excellent Mistake Proofing devices, and some that really should not be classed as such. I would love to hear about your encounters, so send in your stories.