August 12, 2015 Industry Forum Blog We know that deploying lean tools improves our performance indicators. We see employee engagement rise when improvement activities are successful. But how do you convince the managers who hold the purse strings of the financial benefits? The answer lies in talking to them in their language – money and more specifically profit. Improvement initiatives can help your business to make more profit in two ways; by: Making more product without additional cost Making the same amount of product for less cost So work out the monetary benefits of your activities and communicate them. Both of the following examples are from actual MasterClass events (identifying information removed). Additional product made – calculate the marginal contribution The marginal contribution is the additional sales value minus the material, labour and overhead costs of producing additional quantities. There are three steps involved in the calculation: Develop a Profit and Loss (or contribution) account based on the current state of the area you are working in. Include reference to the measures that will be used to monitor the progress of the improvement. Use the previous twelve months’ activity. If data is only available for a shorter period it should be extrapolated to produce an annualised figure. This gives a fair comparison. Recreate the account using the improved measures to show a forecast profit or contribution for the next twelve months. Compare the bottom line figures calculated in the two columns. Marginal contribution example Application of the Line Balance technique resulted in improved People Productivity and reduced Not Right First Time. The additional output is sold and the cost of scrap is reduced. Measure Before Improvement After Improvement Not Right First Time 28,476 ppm 25,234 ppm People Productivity 268 ppoh 277 ppoh Benefit Calculation Before Improvement After Improvement Sales volume A 32,000,000 35,200,000 Sales price/unit B £0.16 £0.16 Total sales C C = B X A £5,120,000 £5,632,000 Direct material cost/unit D £0.0386 £0.0386 Total direct material costs E E = D X A £1,235,200 £1,358,720 Scrap cost/unit F £0.0098 £0.00814 Total scrap cost G G = F X A £313,600 £286,528 Contribution H H = C – (E + G) £3,571,200 £3,986,752 Additional contribution I I = H after – H before £415,552 The increase in sales volume, material used and the reduction in scrap will show in those lines of the Profit and Loss account. The additional contribution calculated in the table, is the overall increase that will show in the profit line of the Profit and Loss account. Reduction in a cost item – calculate the total impact Cost savings may result from the reduction in the amount of labour required, the amount of scrap generated, the amount of consumables, materials or power used, the loss of material, fluids, oils, coolants or compressed air used, special freight charges or late delivery penalties. Again calculate the saving over a fixed period of a year. The figures you need are usually found in accounts. Total impact example The Set Up Improvement technique was deployed resulting in reduced set up time. This allowed an additional number of set ups to be done, resulting in reduced batch sizes, less work in progress and finished goods being held. The financial benefits are calculated as follows: Before Improvement After Improvement Stock A From stock check £375,077 £201,121 Stock cost % B Between 10 & 50% organisation dependent 30% 30% Stock holding costs C C = A x B £112,523 £60,336 Savings D L = C before – C improved £52,187 Cash generated E E = A before – A improved £173,956 Interest % F 10% Interest saved G G = E x F £17,396 Total annual savings H H = D + G £69,583 The reduction in stock holding cost is seen in various line items in the Profit and Loss account depending on what costs are incurred in your business. The reduction in stock and increase in cash generated will show as changes on the Balance Sheet. The total annual saving is seen as increased profit in the Profit and Loss account. Using the financial benefit If the activity results in making more for less and reducing cost items you can add both the calculated benefits together. Remember though, when you communicate the benefits you need to include the cost of the improvement activity! Finally, you mat want to make sure somebody revisits your costing system to translate the savings made into a reduced price for the customer. If you have found other ways to show the impact on your bottom line, share it with us.
July 30, 2015 Industry Forum Blog Big data is all the rage, but are we using our “local” data to our best advantage? Let’s call “local data” the raw data you generate in your work place; like your KPI results, breakdown and maintenance print outs and various quality logs. What do you do with it? If you use it correctly you can maximise your business performance. You need to: Turn the data into useable information Act on that information to improve your performance Turn the data into useable information Data analysis is the conversion of raw data e.g. print outs, KPI numbers etc. into easily understood information that can then be used to drive action. Most forms of data analysis result in a chart, graph or data trail being produced, Try this exercise to understand why we convert raw data to a chart. How quickly can you identify; the highest, the lowest and the repeated number from the following list? Time yourself. Now try the same test with the following data. How quickly can you identify; the highest, the lowest and the repeated number? Check both your answers at the bottom of the post I bet you were quickest interpreting the chart? And if you got an answer wrong it was on the list test? Why is that? The chart is easier and quicker to interpret accurately. This is because the data in the chart is arranged in ascending order and colour has been used to highlight the area of interest. But what is it really doing for us? If we add other relevant information to the chart we start to turn the data into useable information. In this standard grid format we have added: Titles to the top and the axes for context. A target line to place the level of performance. A data source box to aid validation and future comparative analysis. And at the bottom of the grid: A comment – which sums up what the chart is telling us An action – which brings us to the 2nd thing we must do with our data Act on that information to improve your performance The action tells us what needs to be done next. This may be an immediate response to ensure daily performance targets are achieved, or it may be more data collection, further analysis or a focussed improvement action. It is vital that each piece of data analysis done drives an action. If no action is taken all you have done is create expensive wallpaper! Tip: Display the information and actions on clear visual display boards. Locate these as close as possible to the relevant workplace. Use them as a central point for communication meetings and briefings between managers, team leaders and teams. Their use raises awareness and helps involve everybody in working towards a common goal. It focuses action by using facts instead of allowing “who shouts loudest” to win. Have a look at the data you have in your workplace. Is it turned into useful information? Do you act on that information to make improvements? If you don’t, challenge yourself to make your data count. Answer A lowest 12, highest 47, repeated 25. Answer B lowest 13, highest 45, repeated 29.
July 28, 2015 Articles The forces of global competition are accelerating the pace of new product introduction. As a result OEMs are expecting higher standards of performance from their supply chain. This often leads to a strategic appraisal of suppliers by OEMs to identify the suppliers which are critical to their new product strategy to ensure that they have developed an effective approach to new product introduction. The rapid rate of innovation is forcing even major companies to upgrade their supply chain management capability as the complexities multiply. The strength of European advanced manufacturing is based on the strength and depth of its supply chain. One effective approach to supplier appraisal uses VDA 6.3, a process based audit standard for evaluating and improving a manufacturing organisation’s processes consistent with ISO9001 and customer specific requirements in the automotive industry. The standard was developed by the German automotive industry and can be used for both evaluating potential or existing suppliers and for internal assessments. Industry Forum provides training and support in the use of VDA 6.3. For a broader global perspective, the leading US professional association for supply chain and operations management, APICS, a not-for-profit international organisation is a premier global provider of research, education and certification programs for supply chain excellence, innovation and resilience. APICS has over 41,000 members and more than 250 international partners including Industry Forum. Last year APICS merged with the Supply Chain Council who developed the cross-industry standard for supply chain management, the Supply Chain Operations Reference (SCOR) Model. In May 2015 it was announced that APICS would merge with AST&L, the professional organisation for transportation and logistics. The merger extends the APICS’s end to end supply chain body of knowledge in line with the overall global supply chain trend for greater integration. The SCOR model helps users communicate and improve supply chain management practices within and between all interested parties in the extended enterprise. The model extends from the supplier’s supplier to the customer’s customer. It is based on three pillars covering process modelling, performance measurement and best practices. The process model identifies six distinct processes – Plan, Source, Make, Deliver, Return, Enable. The performance measurement pillar offers 150 key indicators. All best practice examples are current, structured, proven and repeatable. The SCOR approach involves setting a suitable scope for the improvement program so that it supports the overall business context. The project team needs to be assembled with care to make a balanced team, ensuring that members have problem solving experience. The initial data collected can be benchmarked against a SCOR database. A gap analysis enables the most promising areas of opportunity to be identified so the problem solving projects take place within a sound strategic framework. More detail about SCOR can be found in Peter Bolstorff’s book, Supply Chain Excellence. An effective way to build up a firm’s capability to create an effective supply chain is through the APICS Certified in Production and Inventory Management (CPIM) programme. It focusses on an organisation’s internal operations taking an in-depth look at the production and inventory activities within the internal operations of a company providing a comprehensive view of materials management, master scheduling, forecasting, production planning and much more. To date, over 100,000+ professionals are CPIM certified. To earn the APICS CPIM designation, operations management professionals must successfully pass five exams. These are process orientated topic areas providing participants with the best possible educational assessment and knowledge base: Basics of Supply Chain Management: The basic concepts in managing the complete flow of materials in a supply chain from suppliers to customers. Supply chain concepts are introduced and basic terminology emphasised, as are relationships among activities in the supply chain. Master Planning of Resources: Demand management, sales and operations planning and master scheduling are examined in-depth. Detailed Scheduling and Planning: Inventory management, materials requirements planning, capacity requirements planning, procurement and supplier relationships. Execution and Control of Operations: The principles, approaches and techniques needed to schedule, control, measure and evaluate the effectiveness of production operations. Strategic Management of Resources: Strategic planning and implementation and a look at how market requirements drive the resources and processes of an organisation. An APICS CPIM qualification will provide individuals with functional knowledge of production and inventory management so that they can predict outcomes more accurately. They will be able to improve efficiency across the processes of their organisation’s supply chain and increase profitability by optimising their organisation’s inventory investment. In this way the ROI on systems and technologies can be maximised. Consequently, achieving CPIM means greater confidence and industry recognition with accelerated career development and better employment opportunities for the individual getting the qualification. From an organisational standpoint the benefits of CPIM include creating a common understanding, vocabulary, processes and frameworks within their organisation to address their supply chain challenges and opportunities plus building the capability to streamline operations from a strategic perspective including the tools to manage global supply chain activities effectively where suppliers, plants, distributors and customers are located around the world. Industry Forum is providing a full programme of courses leading to the APICS CPIM qualification using their in depth experience of supply chain development in both the automotive sector and other sectors such as aerospace, industrial products, electronics and medical devices. This expertise includes many projects working across a whole supply chain from OEM down to the lower tiers. Further information: enquires@if.wearecoal.work +44 (0)121 717 6600 Download Article (pdf)
July 22, 2015 Industry Forum Blog We all know it’s vital to get senior management engagement if we want our improvement programmes to be successful. We also want our managers to lead them with the right attitude to change. Here are two quick exercises you can use to help you influence the approach management teams take to improvement initiatives. They require minimal equipment and advance preparation and so you can use them exactly where and when you need them. The Cane Game Objective The team must lower the cane to the ground keeping it perfectly level at all times! Instructions Break into teams of at least 8 people Line up opposite each other Each team member holds out the forefingers of each hand When the fingers are level, but not touching, the facilitator lays a garden cane on top of the fingers The facilitator starts the exercise by saying ‘go’, and makes sure that the team keeps the cane perfectly level They must stop and level up before moving further down to the floor I have never found a team yet who can keep the cane level all the way to the ground on their first attempt! Now capture their comments on how they found the game. Learning points Working as a team is hard Change is hard Sometimes an obvious request goes frustratingly slowly Tip: You don’t have to have a garden cane, any straight pole will do, like a brush handle. If you travel a lot then buy a folding tent pole; usually under £10 from camping shops. The Wallet Exercise Objective The team will be asked to conduct an improvement activity on other members’ possessions. Instructions Ask everyone in the room to stand up and place their wallet or purse on the table or floor in front of them. (Don’t panic if people opt out. Put yours in to encourage a few takers) Have everyone move one place to their left (or right, it doesn’t matter) Tell everyone to pick-up the wallet/purse in front of them and when the facilitator says go, they have to dump it all out and reorganise Get rid of everything they don’t think is needed and put items back where they think they work best At this point, everyone in the room will get a bit upset… this is good. Don’t actually go ahead with having anyone reorganise another person’s wallet, but capture peoples reactions on a flipchart Learning points The emotion you feel at the thought of having someone else pry into your possessions is what employees feel if outside teams come into their work place and start to make changes without them being involved or consulted How did the people who did not hand over their wallets feel compared to those who did? They might be feeling safe, and possibly a little smug! How would you deal with these people in the workplace if they were refusing to join in with your improvement activity? Have a look at The tale of the team and the newt to see what could happen depending on the choice you made. Tip: This exercise is useful for heading off situations where prior communication and consultation has been sub-optimal and you haven’t got time to introduce the Change Management principles in full. Have you tried these exercises before? Did you get the results you were looking for or do you have a different “game” that works?
July 16, 2015 Industry Forum Blog 1 million parts per month, from brackets to fully functioning coffee machines. An average batch size of just 36 parts and the introduction of 450 new parts per month. Yet the employees at this fast moving engineering firm still found time to save £435,000 last year. I went to catch up with Operations Director, Keith Nicholl, to find out how KMF Precision Sheet Metal Ltd. has generated this improvement culture. In the last 5 years the company have saved £1.6 million as a result of implementing employees’ suggestions. All 385 employees are eligible to register in the Productivity Share Scheme. Each idea they submit is rapidly assessed and if considered worth investment the employee gets the go ahead to implement it. Progress is monitored at the weekly Continuous Improvement Review meetings, held for both day and night shifts. There is an established tariff for savings. A standard amount of money is allocated per hour of time saved and for quality, safety and welfare improvements. Each employee can make unlimited suggestions and actual savings made over the year are accumulated in a pot. At the end of the year all those who have achieved the minimum savings target (£1500 this year) take a share of the pot. Since starting 6 years ago the number of employees signing up has increased from 150 to 282 and the savings have gone from £100,000 to £435,000. Successful entrants have risen from 65 to 176…its tough and so not everyone hits the target. The savings have contributed to a profitable performance and have allowed KMF to expand their business. In the last 2 years over £2million has been invested in new folding equipment alone as the company supplies new sectors. What is the secret behind the success? “It’s a back to basics approach” explains Keith. “Employees get training sessions in 5C, 7 Waste and the Plug Game. This demonstrates the benefits of those tools as well as flow.” Despite the complexity of the product flow it is the application of lots of simple ideas that has yielded the benefits. Keith adds, “Lean had been tried before but ideas were rarely implemented. Making the person who suggested the idea responsible for implementing it has made a big difference. The weekly CI Review meetings have never been cancelled and A3 summaries are used to track progress and capture learning as well as instilling a PDCA (Plan, Do, Check, Act) attitude.” How will you sustain the culture as you expand? “When I started as Business Improvement Manager 9 years ago, there were two of us leading improvement. Gary Sutton is now the Quality Manager. The CI team who report directly to me is expanding to three.” Keith now manages engineering, quality, New Product Introduction, design and the CI functions. This includes the set up and layout of new manufacturing areas and will soon add the recruitment and induction function. Add that to the widespread involvement in the Productivity Share Scheme and you can see that the influence of CI is spreading. However as the product range expands and the company grows it isn’t plain sailing. Keith points out that it is very easy for standards to slip in an environment that is constantly adapting to meet its order book. “The focus now is to reinforce the back to basics approach through the Team Leaders. If we look after the 5C condition everything else will follow” Write in if you would like to share your success story with us or to ask Keith a question. For examples of how Industry Forum helps companies with the back to basics approach visit our case study section.
July 9, 2015 Industry Forum Blog There is an overwhelming, and sometimes conflicting, amount of advice about must have key performance indicators. Try these ideas to help you select the most useful for your particular business. Choose the KPI appropriate for the level you are measuring at In your organisation you have different groups of employees. They require different information in order for them to carry out their responsibilities. Research into businesses that have successfully implemented a continuous improvement culture concludes that you must use measures appropriate to each organisational level. In addition these measures must tie in with the organisation’s strategy. Do the measures you have selected meet the needs of all the different user groups? Shareholders, board and executive members. Operations managers at plant and department levels. Team leaders and team members at cell level. Managers and team members of non manufacturing departments. And do the measures cover? Meeting daily performance targets and satisfying customer demand. Achieving strategic goals. Tracking the progress of improvement activity. At the end of this post I have put a few links to articles and publications demonstrating the wide variety of measures you may consider. Don’t have too many Just having one key measure will not give you the full picture. Equally having a one size fits all “dashboard” of measures with the complexity of a flight deck attracts limited buy in. In my days as a fire fighting shift manager, a team of external consultants insisted my colleagues and I needed 96 key measures to manage daily operations. I walked out! Perhaps if they had helped us to put in just 3 or 4 measures we would not have rejected the idea. And if those measures were selected to help us focus on our biggest problems and eliminate them…….. The key is to create a set of measures that are appropriate for each level of the organisation and tie daily business to the achievement of both strategic and operational targets. The Integration Model, discussed in a previous blog, helps you to do just this. Test it – could it drive the wrong behaviour? An associate I recently worked with shocked me with this story. Many schools in the UK are judged on their pupil attendance metric. When it snows there are usually a number of children who can’t get into school and so the pupil attendance figure drops. However if the school is officially shut for the day (often using Health and Safety as a reason) then the pupil attendance figure does not drop! Is this metric driving the right behaviour by the schools? What is the knock on effect on working parents? The same associate recommends this approach when defining your KPIs. As a team, brainstorm all the ways in which you can improve the KPI. Then examine if any of these could drive unwanted behaviours and try to mitigate this. You may need to use 2 measures to ensure a balanced approach. You can achieve excellent Delivery Schedule Adherence by keeping high levels of finished goods, but this drives up costs associated with inventory. So measure Stock Turns as well. How have you selected the best KPIs? What horror stories have you found? Interesting Links For basic cell and department level measures that provide a great start for focusing on operational issues read QCD Bernard Marr 25 KPIs Every Manager Must Know Greg Jacobson 6 Continuous Improvement Metrics
July 8, 2015 Insights The most common reason for a new product to fail is that it doesn’t find a market on the anticipated scale even though the total global annual spend on new product development is estimated at $1 trillion currently. This amounts to over $150 for every person on the planet. New Product Introduction (NPI) is built round four phases – concept formation, refinement, prototyping and production but digital tools are transforming each of these. Connectivity is now as critical to manufacturing success as the four classic factors – materials, skills, energy and capital investment. Digitisation has brought shorter development timescales, low cost rapid prototyping, new manufacturing technologies offering greater accuracy and mass customisation, new actual and potential business models, for example via the internet of things, and the chance to develop and sustain richer collaborative networks. Customers of all kinds are finding out about products and services in new ways as products and services and are better informed than ever before. These developments are increasing the competitive potential of smaller businesses across the globe. In response, larger firms are increasing the rate of new product and service introductions and upgrades. A moving target is much harder for a potentially disruptive new competitor with cost or resource advantages to overtake. Manufacturing provenance can still be a key asset as evidenced by the continuing strength of the UK’s premium automotive brands. Industry Forum’s Manufacturing Advisory Group (MAG) recently met to consider the implications of these developments where the factory life-time for each product is contracting. MAG agreed that facilities-sharing by firms who otherwise may be competitors is beginning to enter into equation. Also increasingly important is the transfer of manufacturing during a single product lifetime between sites within a group with different production capabilities. Production and Supply Issues This current business environment is summarised in the acronym, VACU: Volatile, Ambiguous, Chaotic and Uncertain . Many UK based OEMs are keen to reduce their risk profile by reshoring their supply chain which provides a major opportunity for smaller UK firms who can master the relevant new product introduction processes and procedures. MAG agrees that it is still too common for the production phase of new product introduction to be hampered by an excess of problems. These problems occur too far downstream and impact on the ramp up to volume production. The timescale the achieving break even and profitability suffers. With a properly structured and managed new product introduction process problems are identified and resolved in the early stages of the process. Ramp up runs much more smoothly, the total cost of new product introduction is reduced and the programme achieves profitability faster showing a better overall return. MAG confirm that the reliability of suppliers is often a major concern especially where a supplier is working on several projects for different customers. If few suppliers are capable of producing a specialist component then those suppliers with the required capability tend to have scheduling problems with ‘the loudest shouting customer’ getting the attention. This may not benefit either the supplier or the customer base beyond the very short term. The choice of a supplier-partner for long term collaboration has become more complex. Manufacturers have to weigh up speed to market vs supplier performance. New products mean new designs which often require new methods of manufacture. New designs can also require new materials, new components or new manufacturing processes and this can seriously restrict the choice of supplier. Composites are replacing metals and additive manufacturing is entering the assembly process. NPI process improvement and strategic commitment MAG see an important role for Industry Forum in providing an impartial assessment of NPI capability in terms of widely accepted standards. They are convinced that with shortened product development timescales the whole supply chain has to be totally committed to ‘right first time’. MAG have found that successful NPI increasingly requires the early finance of the skills development, particularly to deepen engineering skills. NPI is often required on simultaneous product lines, which means resources get spread thinly. Resources have to be reallocated to tackle the risks in NPI and reduce them with continuous improvement. IF has examined UK manufacturers’ approach to new product introduction finding that at tier 2 and below there are still too many SMEs who do not manage new product introduction as a cross-functional process with stage gates. They have yet to use standards or procedures such as Advanced Product Quality Planning (APQP) or the German supplier assessment process, VDA 6.3, and they have not started on time compression by using concurrent activities. These firms seem to have limited incentive to invest in the higher level skills that underpin these approaches. Firms working at tiers 1 and 2, who are often mid-caps, have some documented standards and packets of good practice but they still do not manage new product introduction as a single end to end process. APQP is not integrated into a gated process and concurrency and cross functional working have very limited application. The skill base is also insufficient. These findings support the recommendations of Parliament’s All Party Manufacturing Group who warn that there are still too many firms in UK manufacturing supply chains, especially at the smaller end, who lack ambition and a long term perspective and strategy. Global firms like ABB Robotics who have invested heavily in making smaller UK firms aware of the benefits of modern manufacturing techniques endorse these conclusions. A structured approach Industry Forum has developed a structured approach to assess and improve customers’ new product introduction (NPI) processes encompassing programme management and review, product and process definition, product development, process development, supplier management and product and process validation. This approach can improve customer satisfaction and profitability, eliminate waste, manage risk better and improve team relationships reducing individuals’ stress levels. Industry Forum’s NPI Effectiveness Assessment encompasses 36 separate categories. The typical stages of the resulting NPI improvement project include: Creating a realistic understanding of the customer’s NPI process maturity via a proven independent assessment Specification of the gap between the current maturity and the level required to support the customer’s future business strategy# Defining the future state process to close the gaps Developing implementation work –stream charters Developing the standard work to support the future process Training to close the key capability gaps Implementing the improved process in bite sized chunks supported by a PDCA approach to continuous improvement Industry Forum can improve customers’ NPI capability by introducing a variety of proven techniques and approaches including problem solving, Product Part Approval Process, Design Failure Mode Effect Analysis, Process Failure Mode Effect Analysis, Measurement Systems Analysis and Statistical Process Control. Further information enquires@if.wearecoal.work +44 (0)121 717 6600 Download Insight (pdf)
July 1, 2015 Industry Forum Blog Do you find that no matter how hard you try you always seem to have some people who refuse to join in with your improvement initiative? How do you deal with them? Well here is a really useful analogy I learned from my training days with the Nissan, Toyota and Honda master trainers. It works for me every time. First let’s imagine a team playing on a field. 10% of your team are playing towards goal. 10% are being defensive. 80% are waiting in the midfield to see if they can move towards goal, or if they need to rush back and defend. This is like your team at work. 10% are striving for improvement and embracing change. 10% are resisting change and new ideas; they defend the status quo. The remaining 80% are waiting to see what happens and then will rush to the end that appears to need them the most. How do you get everybody to move forwards? Option 1: Tackle the defenders You spend a lot of your time working with the people resisting change, trying to persuade them to see your point of view. Maybe you give up and transfer them to another department or even sack them! But beware! Let us think about the garden newt. What happens if we cut the tail off the newt? ……………..In a little while it grows back! And this will happen if you follow option 1. If you pay a lot of attention to the 10% resisiting change or worse, get rid of them, your midfield watchers will rush to assist those defenders. Result – distrust spreads, more defenders of the status quo, and your initiative loses momentum and fails. Option 2: Concentrate on the attackers Pay a lot of attention to the 10% going forwards, work with them, and celebrate their successes. The 80% in midfield will start to rush forwards as well and join the attack. Result – feel good factor, more people attack and the initiative gains momentum. But what about the tail? The tail actually follows along, it may never move into attack, but it does move forwards from its original position. It may even decrease in size. However the tail will always be there, you can’t cut it off! A cautionary tale One day I forgot about this analogy and I attempted to engage one member of the team who was particularly reticent about joining in with the kaizen event. I asked him to go and take the team photos for me, so we could use them as part of the event story. 15 minutes later he proudly returned, not with a set of photos, but with a trail of other team members who suddenly didn’t want to be photographed or be part of the event! Too late I remembered about the newt’s tail and it took a lot of extra work to get the team back on board. Have you had similar experiences? Let me know how you move your whole team forwards.
June 24, 2015 Industry Forum Blog Appointing a project manager for each project has been identified as one of the six basic success factors to improve your ability to get new products to market quicker and cheaper. In essence the project manager has the authority to run the project on a day to day basis and is responsible for ensuring project success within the tolerances set by the project sponsor. Projects typically have to be delivered within certain time, cost and quality limits and within the tolerances set on scope, risk and benefits. To simplify the huge range of information and guidelines for project managers I have created one simple model of core responsibilities. You will see that it combines PRINCE2 project guidelines with Adair’s Action Centred Leadership model, the PDCA cycle and vital leadership skills. The 4 key responsibilities boil down to: Manage day to day tasks Manage information flows Conduct specific project tasks Lead the project team Manage the day to day tasks. These are represented by the Plan, Assign, Monitor, Control cycle. This is a version of Deming’s Plan, Do, Check, Act cycle. The project manager plans the sequence of tasks to achieve the project objectives and the resources to achieve those plans. Plans in NPI projects typically exist at project, stage and task level and are produced at different times with different levels of scope and detail. The project manager assigns some of the tasks to others; especially those requiring specialist knowledge e.g. design. They then monitor the tasks to make sure they are on plan. If not then some form of corrective action plan is made in order to control the project. Continuing problems are escalated. The control phase also includes the introduction of performance improvement, such as ways to improve cost or reduce lead time. Manage the information flows. The project manager needs to make the right information available at the right time to the right people, for them to make the right decisions. In our diagram, information flows are represented by the two way orange arrows. Conduct specific project management tasks. The project manager has the responsibility for; initiating the project, preparing for the gates and closing down the project. Useful guidelines on these tasks can be found in PRINCE2. Lead the project team. People are crucial to the success of a project; it will not succeed simply by having excellent strategies, guidelines, standards and rules. The project manager needs to balance the project, the team and the individual. Adair’s Action Centred Leadership model is a useful structure to help gain this balance. To do it well the project manager needs the ability to: Delegate to individuals and cross functional teams. Motivate individuals and cross functional teams. Manage people through periods of change and when assigning project tasks. Adapt their leadership style to meet the needs of the team in a variety of situations. Communicate effectively. As you will realise there is a lot of detail behind each of these 4 key responsibilities, but hopefully these give you a balanced overview of the project managers’ role. Let me know if there are any other core responsibilities that you would include.
June 17, 2015 Industry Forum Blog Whether you have chosen TPM, lean, EFQM, 6 Sigma or another method, you need to ensure it supports the achievement of your operational targets and your strategic goals. But each organisation has finite resources in terms of the people, time and money that can be dedicated to achieve these. Typically we find that 99% of a managers’ time is spent dealing with items on the operational side, leaving the strategic decisions and improvement programme as bolt on or additional activities. The secret to balancing all of these demands is to not overburden the organisation with numerous different plans and to ensure that there is no conflict between managing daily business, achieving the vital few stretch goals and introducing an improvement programme. To do this you need to carefully consider and then merge the review systems used to manage these aspects of your business. This then gives you the framework to position your chosen improvement methodology and maximise the benefits. At Industry Forum we developed what we call the Integration Model that has helped organisations to do just this. Click here for an overview of the Integration Model. Central to the Integration Model are: Having performance measures for both operational and strategic management in one place An effective steering and governance system Operational and strategic performance measures in one place The best way of doing this is to set up visual communication boards within the organisation and use them for reporting daily, weekly and monthly progress. We usually place these at plant, area and team level. The plant board is often called the Obeya and is developed over time to incorporate these key features: The annual plan and daily performance measures, X-Matrix and SQCD in this example Current performance vs. targets for both sets of information Demonstrated links between the annual policy targets and daily measures Action plans for gaps between actual and target performance A method to limit the number of open actions This Obeya schematic shows the maximum number of corrective actions and activity trackers, A3s, allowed to be open at any one time. The link between operational and strategic targets and the number of ongoing actions are critical. If there is no link or there are too many open actions then your resources will be swamped and few goals will be achieved. Effective steering and governance This encompasses the rules that state who meets, when, at what frequency, what they do at each meeting and what the expected outputs are. In order to eliminate duplication and other forms of waste your steering and governance system should be designed to use joint resources, people and physical report formats. Now that the operational and strategic goals are linked you are in an excellent position to embed your chosen improvement methodology. Do this by using direct references to the tools and techniques to be deployed on the plans and action trackers on the visual management boards. Planning, deployment and review of your improvement programme becomes part of the daily, weekly and monthly reporting structure. Conducting specific improvement activities becomes the way to achieve operational and strategic targets. Have you benefited from using a system like this? Let me know how you have got on.